Perceptions of phenomena as Parts or as Wholes are orthogonal constructions of meaning, in some tenuous and trivial way analogous to vertical versus horizontal heads of hair.
PAW, you managed to construct one really long, kind of senseless sentence that included four instances of alliteration; 3 two-bangers and 1 three-banger. Why do you write this way? Why do you write this way, even spontaneously? Are you like this in person? Are you like this in person, spontaneously? Does this have anything to do with parts, or wholes, or Parts and Wholes as you style them here?
moiety, you can't even get your alliteration counts correct - you're as pathetic as PAW. That's TWO three-bangers, and TWO two-bangers, plus another spontaneous two-banger just now, bringing the bang-count up to two threes and three twos. What is going on in there? here?
except that "phenomena" as a word (sing.) bears no initial, vocal, (in a word, alliterative) relation to EITHER perception OR part, reducing your incomprehensible effort at literary (?) quantification to shambles. SOMEONE may be so piqued as to go back and count again now, but why, really?
HALLO MOIETY! Welcome welcome to blogland where we can each live in selfconcious scrutiny of ourselves. Love to read, and admire your mop. Mine's falling out all over the place. I believe I'm becoming the first (gasp) thin-haired Buchert.
11 comments:
PAW, you managed to construct one really long, kind of senseless sentence that included four instances of alliteration; 3 two-bangers and 1 three-banger. Why do you write this way? Why do you write this way, even spontaneously? Are you like this in person? Are you like this in person, spontaneously? Does this have anything to do with parts, or wholes, or Parts and Wholes as you style them here?
moiety, you can't even get your alliteration counts correct - you're as pathetic as PAW. That's TWO three-bangers, and TWO two-bangers, plus another spontaneous two-banger just now, bringing the bang-count up to two threes and three twos. What is going on in there? here?
except that "phenomena" as a word (sing.) bears no initial, vocal, (in a word, alliterative) relation to EITHER perception OR part, reducing your incomprehensible effort at literary (?) quantification to shambles. SOMEONE may be so piqued as to go back and count again now, but why, really?
PAW, I love you.
HALLO MOIETY! Welcome welcome to blogland where we can each live in selfconcious scrutiny of ourselves. Love to read, and admire your mop. Mine's falling out all over the place. I believe I'm becoming the first (gasp) thin-haired Buchert.
Post more! Viva Pee'n'dub!
So far this is a very small part of your whole potential blog. Post again!
Did I miss the formal announcement that this new and exciting blog was starting?
Don't stop now, Moiety. Give us the goods!
xo
I just subscribed to your blog. You can start posting again now. : )
mazeltov, moiety! with your kind permission, i will link to your blog, but you must blog again. will you?
What's the deal with no rat tail?
how did i miss this blog for so long? and where are your more posts?
Post a Comment